The format of A Quarter Century of Unix, with most of the text in the form of extended quotations (some scores of people are quoted from at length), runs the risk of discontinuity and lack of focus. Salus has chosen and edited his source material well, however, and inserted his own summary and exposition in appropriate places. The result is both informative and enjoyable, with a good balance between the personal and the technical.
I did spot a few minor inconsistencies — on page 155 we read "It was 32V that became 3BSD in 1979", though the Unix versions tree on page 61 shows no such influence — and errors — on page 253 we have "It was clear that AT&T hadn't objected to other derivatives: Linux, MINIX, etc. In the autumn of 1988...", implying that Linux existed in 1988 (and Linus' name is misspelt in the index, too). But these are just quibbles. A more weighty criticism would be that the book sometimes reads more like myth than history, with the participants portrayed like epic heroes. This may worry the historians, but in many ways it is the legends and myths that are the most influential.
You don't need a lot of technical knowledge to read A Quarter Century of Unix, but the more you know about Unix (and to a lesser extent about architectures and operating systems more generally) the more you will get out of it — if you've never used awk, for example, you will probably have little interest in reading about its origins and development. The main audience will be programmers, administrators and users with extensive Unix experience, but people in marketing and management might well learn a thing or two from it, and historians and sociologists studying the computer industry will find Salus' work an essential source of primary material. A Quarter Century of Unix should be a great success; it's only surprising that it wasn't written years ago!
- Related reviews:
- Peter H. Salus - Casting the Net: From ARPANET to Internet and Beyond
- books about computing
- books published by Addison-Wesley